In a recent social media post, Elon Musk's daughter, Vivian Wilson, has sparked controversy by accusing her father of using sex-selective in vitro fertilization (IVF) for his children. This revelation has brought attention to the ethical implications of such practices and the personal impact on individuals involved. Wilson, now 20 years old, expressed her feelings about being born with an assigned sex that was chosen through financial transactions, highlighting the emotional struggle she faced growing up. Her comments have reignited debates around the legality and ethics of sex selection in the United States, where such practices are permitted but remain controversial worldwide.
Vivian Wilson Speaks Out Against Sex Selection Practices
In a poignant Threads post on Monday, Vivian Wilson, daughter of tech mogul Elon Musk, shared her profound reflections on the circumstances surrounding her birth. Born into a family where five of Musk’s fourteen children were conceived through IVF, Wilson revealed that her assigned sex at birth felt like a commodity purchased and paid for. She emphasized the deep-seated conflict she experienced as a transgender individual, having to defy societal expectations rooted in monetary transactions. Wilson and her twin brother were born to Musk’s first wife, Justine Musk. The SpaceX founder is known for his numerous children from various relationships.
Wilson’s words resonated strongly when she questioned the legality of sex selection via IVF in the U.S., expressing disbelief that such practices are still allowed. In many parts of the world, sex selection during IVF is banned due to ethical concerns. Her candid post also drew attention to her previous legal actions in 2022, where she sought to change her name and disassociate herself from her biological father, emphasizing her desire to sever all ties.
This disclosure has not only shed light on the personal struggles of individuals born through selective methods but also prompted broader discussions about the ethical boundaries of reproductive technologies.
From a journalist's perspective, Wilson’s story serves as a powerful reminder of the far-reaching consequences of scientific advancements in reproductive medicine. It challenges us to reconsider the balance between technological capabilities and human dignity. As society continues to grapple with these complex issues, it is crucial to ensure that the rights and well-being of future generations are prioritized over commercial interests. Wilson’s courage in speaking out invites deeper reflection on the ethical dimensions of our choices and their long-term impacts on individuals and society.